Skip to content

fix: resolve #737 - missing consistency check during metamodel parsing - #744

Closed
KIRA-L001 wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
KIRA-L001:fix-737-6956
Closed

fix: resolve #737 - missing consistency check during metamodel parsing#744
KIRA-L001 wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
KIRA-L001:fix-737-6956

Conversation

@KIRA-L001

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes #737.

Generated fix for: missing consistency check during metamodel parsing

Implements a self-contained solution in contrib_737_missing_consistency_check_during_metamod.py.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: c1cd4237-56c7-43bb-a254-93ae058a8e92
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//src:license-check': no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 5.892s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

@AlexanderLanin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey there, thanks for the contribution. Unfortunately it's not clear what his code does, I would ask you do enhance it in some way, at least with comments. And make sure you complete the legal framework, namely the ECA. If you need any support, you can ask there or in #score-infrastructure in Slack. See also https://eclipsesdv.org/get-involved/

@AlexanderLanin
AlexanderLanin marked this pull request as draft August 24, 2026 06:51
@AlexanderLanin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Feel free to reopen once the criteria above have been met

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missing consistency check during metamodel parsing

2 participants